Home > Judgments > Accident Claim Law > Rajni Case
Railway Compensation

Railway Compensation: Lost Ticket Doesn't Deny Rights

Supreme Court rules lost railway tickets cannot deny compensation to accident victims' families

Case Reference: Rajni & Anr. vs. Union of India (2025 INSC 1201) Decided by: Supreme Court of India Date: October 8, 2025

❓ Question

IF A LOVED ONE DIES AFTER FALLING FROM A TRAIN, BUT THEIR TICKET IS LOST AND WASN'T FORMALLY SEIZED BY THE POLICE, CAN THE RAILWAYS DENY YOU COMPENSATION?

✅ Answer

NO. The Supreme Court has firmly ruled that the failure to recover a physical ticket or the absence of a formal seizure memo cannot, by itself, defeat a legitimate claim for compensation.

The Railways Act is a welfare legislation designed to provide swift relief to victims of accidents, not a punitive statute. The focus must be on the substance of justice—whether the person was a bona fide passenger—rather than on procedural technicalities that are often beyond the family's control.

⚖️ Understanding the Legal Principles

📜 Railways Act is Welfare Legislation

  • Purpose Over Procedure: Primary objective is social security and immediate relief
  • Different Standards of Proof: Not a criminal trial - uses "preponderance of probabilities"
  • Hyper-Technicality Forbidden: Insisting on formal seizure memos is incorrect approach
  • Citizen-Centric Approach: Focus on substance of justice, not procedural technicalities

⚖️ Burden of Proof Shifts in Two Steps

  • Step 1: Claimant's Initial Burden: Present prima facie case through affidavit
  • Step 2: Railway's Burden to Rebut: Railways must prove deceased was NOT a passenger
  • Practical Application: Widow's affidavit + official verification sufficient
  • Evidence Standard: Totality of circumstances considered

🔍 Official Verification is Powerful Evidence

  • Verification Trumps Non-Recovery: Official ticket verification crucial evidence
  • DRM Report Evidence: Railway's own report verifying ticket issuance
  • Location and Injuries: Body location and nature of injuries considered
  • Inquest Report: Official police inquest report as supporting evidence

📚 Real Case Example from Supreme Court

Incident Date

Accident: Passenger fell from train and died

Ticket Status: Physical ticket lost, not recovered by police

Initial Claim

Family filed compensation claim with Railway Claims Tribunal

Submitted affidavit and available documents

Railway's Response

Denied Claim: Cited missing ticket and no seizure memo

Technical Grounds: Argued insufficient evidence of bona fide passenger status

Supreme Court Decision

COMPENSATION AWARDED — Lost ticket cannot deny rights

Railways Act is welfare legislation, not punitive statute

⚖️ Critical Evidence That Won the Case:

  • Widow's detailed affidavit stating facts of journey
  • Official DRM report verifying ticket issuance
  • Police inquest report confirming circumstances
  • Location of body near railway tracks
  • Nature of injuries consistent with train accident

🧭 Your Action Plan: Navigating Railway Claims

📝 If You Are Claiming Compensation

✅ Act Promptly and Gather Documents

  • File Detailed Affidavit: State all facts about the journey
  • Collect All Paperwork: FIR, inquest report, post-mortem report
  • File Claim Timely: Lodge claim with Railway Claims Tribunal within time limit
  • Preserve Communications: Keep all official correspondence

✅ Use Shifting Burden Strategy

  • Present Prima Facie Case: Clearly state you're discharging initial burden
  • Force Railways to Respond: Challenge them to prove non-passenger status
  • Cite Supreme Court Precedent: Reference Rajni case principles
  • Focus on Substance: Emphasize welfare legislation purpose

✅ Challenge Procedural Shortcomings

  • Argue Welfare Principle: Reject hyper-technical approaches
  • Focus on Core Question: "Was the person a passenger who died in accident?"
  • Use Official Verification: Highlight any railway records confirming journey
  • Emphasize Practical Reality: Families can't control evidence preservation in trauma

⚖️ If You Are Railway Administration

✅ Adopt Citizen-Centric Approach

  • Facilitate, Don't Frustrate: Provide relief to genuine victims
  • Proactive Investigation: Use railway resources to verify facts
  • Avoid Technical Denials: Don't reject claims based on missing seizure memos
  • Consider Totality: Look at all circumstances, not just missing documents

✅ Meet Shifted Burden with Evidence

  • Provide Positive Evidence: If contesting, prove non-passenger status
  • Avoid Mere Denials: Don't just point out gaps in claimant's case
  • Use Internal Records: Check ticket issuance and passenger manifests
  • Fair Assessment: Balance administrative efficiency with justice

⚖️ Burden of Proof: Two-Step Process

Step Responsibility Evidence Required Outcome
Step 1
Initial Burden		 Claimant/Family Affidavit + Basic Documents (FIR, Inquest Report) Prima facie case established
Step 2
Rebutting Burden		 Railway Administration Positive evidence proving non-passenger status Must disprove claimant's case with evidence

💡 Key Insight:

Once the family presents a basic case through affidavit and available documents, the burden SHIFTS to the Railways to prove the deceased was NOT a passenger. Mere denial or pointing out documentation gaps is insufficient.

🔍 Official Verification Over Physical Evidence

✅ What Counts as Strong Evidence

  • Railway's Internal Verification: DRM report confirming ticket issuance
  • Official Affidavits: Detailed sworn statements from family
  • Police Documentation: FIR and inquest reports
  • Medical Evidence: Post-mortem report consistent with accident
  • Circumstantial Evidence: Location, timing, journey purpose

🚫 What Cannot Defeat Claims

  • Missing Physical Ticket: Lost during accident or recovery
  • No Seizure Memo: Police didn't formally seize ticket
  • Documentation Gaps: Missing secondary documents
  • Procedural Technicalities: Hyper-technical legal arguments

📋 Document Checklist for Railway Claims

✅ Essential Documents to Collect:

  • First Information Report (FIR) - Police record of incident
  • Inquest Report - Official investigation under Section 174 CrPC
  • Post-Mortem Report - Medical examination findings
  • Detailed Affidavit - Sworn statement of facts
  • Identity Proof - Of deceased and claimants
  • Relationship Proof - Documents establishing legal heir status

✅ Additional Supporting Evidence:

  • Any railway communication or verification
  • Witness statements if available
  • Photographs of accident scene (if possible)
  • Travel purpose documentation (business, medical, etc.)
  • Previous travel tickets or patterns

📞 When to Get Legal Help

👨‍⚖️ Lawyer Essential For:

  • Complex cases with significant compensation amounts
  • Railway denials based on technical grounds
  • Appeals to higher courts (High Court, Supreme Court)
  • Interpretation of legal principles and precedents
  • Cases involving multiple legal heirs or disputes

📝 You Can Handle With Support:

  • Initial claim filing with proper guidance
  • Document collection and organization
  • Basic understanding of your rights
  • Following up on claim status
  • Working with legal aid services

🚨 Practical Steps for Claimants

⚡ Immediate Actions After Accident:

  1. File Police Report Immediately

    Ensure FIR is registered with all relevant details about the journey and circumstances.

  2. Collect All Available Documents

    Gather FIR, inquest report, post-mortem report, and any railway communications.

  3. Prepare Detailed Affidavit

    Create comprehensive sworn statement covering all journey details and facts.

  4. File Claim with Railway Tribunal

    Submit claim within prescribed time limit with all supporting documents.

⚖️ Guidance for Railway Administration

🎯 Recommended Approach:

  1. Adopt Welfare-First Mindset

    Remember Railways Act is social welfare legislation - prioritize genuine relief over technical objections.

  2. Proactive Verification

    Use internal systems to verify passenger status before deciding to oppose claims.

  3. Avoid Hyper-Technical Denials

    Don't reject claims solely based on missing physical tickets or seizure memos.

  4. Focus on Substantive Justice

    Consider totality of circumstances rather than procedural perfection.

💡 Core Takeaway from Supreme Court

"The law is a shield for the vulnerable, not a labyrinth of procedure."

"This judgment is a powerful affirmation that the justice system exists to serve people, especially in their moments of greatest vulnerability. By condemning a hyper-technical approach, the Supreme Court has ensured that the compassionate intent of welfare legislation is not strangled by procedural red tape."

🌐 Impact on Railway Compensation Claims:

  • Accessible Justice: Families no longer need perfect documentation
  • Practical Approach: Courts consider real-world circumstances of accidents
  • Burden Properly Allocated: Railways must actively disprove claims, not just point gaps
  • Welfare Focus: Compensation remains real relief, not theoretical promise

⚠️ DISCLAIMER

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.

🌿 LegalEcoSys Mission

Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.