Supreme Court rules local experience requirements unconstitutional - violates right to equality and freedom of profession
CAN GOVERNMENT TENDERS RESTRICT BIDDING ONLY TO COMPANIES WITH PREVIOUS LOCAL EXPERIENCE IN THAT STATE?
NO. The Supreme Court has ruled that requiring previous local state experience in government tenders is unconstitutional as it violates the right to equality and freedom to practice any profession, creating artificial barriers and promoting cartelization.
Right to Equality: Prohibits arbitrary classification and ensures equal protection of laws
Government cannot discriminate between similarly placed bidders
Freedom of Profession: Right to practice any profession, trade or business
Restrictions must be reasonable and in public interest
Supreme Court Ruling: Vinishma Technologies case establishes clear precedent
Local experience requirements declared unconstitutional
| Constitutional Provision | What It Protects | How It Applies to Tenders |
|---|---|---|
| Article 14 Right to Equality |
Prohibits arbitrary classification and discrimination | Government cannot exclude bidders based on local experience |
| Article 19(1)(g) Freedom of Profession |
Right to practice any trade, profession or business | Restrictions must be reasonable and serve public interest |
| Article 19(6) Reasonable Restrictions |
Allows reasonable restrictions in public interest | Local experience requirements are not reasonable restrictions |
"Level playing field ensures best value for public money - not local preferences."
"Competence matters, not geography - judge bidders on capability, not location."
"Wider participation breaks cartels and reduces costs."
"Constitutional rights protect businesses from arbitrary exclusion."
"Fair competition serves public interest better than local protectionism."
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.
Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.