Supreme Court clarifies when convictions cannot stand due to hostile witnesses and broken evidence chains
CAN SOMEONE BE CONVICTED FOR MURDER AND KIDNAPPING BASED ONLY ON WITNESSES WHO LATER CHANGE THEIR STORY AND FAIL TO IDENTIFY THE ACCUSED?
No. The Supreme Court has ruled that when key witnesses turn hostile and fail to identify the accused or support the prosecution's case, the conviction cannot stand, especially in cases based entirely on circumstantial evidence.
Evidence must form complete chain of circumstances
Evidence must point conclusively to guilt of accused
Circumstances must be consistent with guilt
"Motive alone cannot replace proof of crime. Hostile witnesses break the chain of conviction. Last seen theory requires clear and unambiguous evidence. Circumstantial evidence must form complete chain pointing only to accused. Golden principles of evidence cannot be compromised for conviction."
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.
Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.